Engines are constantly at the back of my head these days. To be able to run on Avgas UL91 seems to be a "must" judging by how things are developing. The ability to run on mogas becomes less important.
I have narrowed it down to VW engines. I have to mount the engine in the aircraft within a reasonable time. I have also included carb, double ignition, exhaust etc in the price. The list looks like this:
Name |
Type |
HP(max) |
RPM(max) |
cc |
kg |
Price € |
TBO [H] |
UL91 |
Mogas |
Revmaster |
2300 |
85 |
3200 |
2331 |
77 |
€ 5 975 |
1 200 |
TBD |
98* |
Hummel |
2400 |
85 |
3400 |
2387 |
76 |
€ 5 380 |
0 |
Y |
98* |
AeroVee |
2.1 |
80 |
3400 |
2180 |
73 |
€ 5 372 |
0 |
Y |
98* |
Great Plains |
2300 |
80 |
3600 |
2276 |
75 |
€ 5 907 |
0 |
Y |
98* |
Sauer |
2200 UL |
85 |
3000 |
2234 |
66 |
€ 10 506 |
1 600 |
Y |
98 |
Sauer |
2400 UL |
100 |
3500 |
2332 |
75 |
€ 11 442 |
1 600 |
Y |
95 |
Revmaster
Pro: Overall excellent quality, TBO, HP, highly recommended by people I have contacted who are using it
Con: Will it run on UL91? That is being tested at this moment.
Hummel
Pro: Largest capacity (2387cc, almost 10% more than AeroVee), HP, UL91
Con: Rather unknown to me, and the website is almost void of info. TBO = 0
AeroVee
Pro: Supported by Sonex, easiest way to get flying, Prop, baffling and everything else fits 100%, UL91, the macho factor of flying around with an engine I have put together myself.
Con: Smallest capacity, HP? TBO = 0, the anxiety factor of flying around with an engine I have put together myself.
GP
Pro: Old and respected company, UL91
Con: Extremely High RPM, TBO = 0
Sauer
Pro: Overall the best engine, HP, Support, TBO, UL91, mogas
Con: Price, probably the most difficult to fit onto the airframe ?
The most desirable is Sauer. Then the Revmaster, more or less a less costly Sauer. I really hope it runs on Avgas UL91. The AeroVee is probably the engine that makes most sense to install, everything considered. The Hummel is the joker of the bunch.